Technology may change, but warfare never does. Video from the U.S. Army War College.
The Scrooby Manor farmhouse Two years ago, you may remember, we saw that William Bradford's…
The ten Boom home A young mother sat on a train, holding her baby girl…
The Battle of Bunker Hill, just outside Boston, was an important battle of the American…
It is not easy to be the little brother of a famous man. Many worthy…
250 years ago the representatives of the citizens of Mecklenburg County, NC declared independence from…
We'd like to announce that we are organizing a Washington and Alaska tour from September 10-23, 2025. It…
View Comments
Inspiring. However, with the technology of drones acting as avatars, from the sky and soon the ground, this may not be true. A leader makes the decision and a few buttons are pushed. War, as history defines it, requires there to be a terrible cost and risk from both sides. If one side risks nothing but the cost of the metal and silicone this is not warfare but instead the act of a bully, who has no fear of its victim's reprisal.
For the record, I am a veteran. BECAUSE OF THIS, I say our nation does better by counting the cost of soldiers' lives and THEN risking them than if we believe ourselves absolved of any restraint for at-arms-length military conquest via drone warfare. Such a change to our society's view of war makes it only easier for our representatives to take actions further and further removed from what is permitted by the Constitution.
Interesting points, thanks for the comment.